The Viking Mission 31 July 1976
many days the Viking landers were on the road until they finally einschwenkten 1976 in an orbit around Mars. After several course corrections, the probes began at an altitude of 2200 kilometers, the surface of Mars to photograph. Each image was 321 024 pixels (picture elements from which it is composed, all conventional photo) disassembled and returned to Earth. Here, the pixels in the National Space Science Data Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, were stored on countless computer tapes.
The evaluation was technically very complicated and very expensive to boot. Why were been a total of 300,000 recorded in 1980 by the first 60 000 reassembling to images.
1980 Vincent DiPietro looked at some of the already-developed images of the Martian surface. Eventually, he brought him in black and white image 35A72. This record was registered on July 31, 1976 the terse subtitles "head". Curious is the record DiPietro looked closer and was shocked. He saw "the lofty image of a human-like face against the background of the Martian landscape - literally DiPietro.
This stone head had a diameter of 1500 meters was included in the Cydonia region. The recording covered a surface area of 63 x 58 km. The image resolution was for that time very considerable. So you could see on the recording details to a size of about 50 meters. ...
As the scientist Gregory Molenaar saw this shot, he offered his assistance DiPietro. was released with a method developed by them methods of analysis "Starbust pixel interleaving techniqe short-SPIT", was the image resolution and the overall quality is improved, so that many more details were visible on the recording.
When the host finally came forward now the critics have their say (Why Always the critic and not supporters of the optical illusion of a ???), caused by light and shadow zones spoke at the rock formation. This objection could, of course, not invalidate that simple, although even on this recording was apparent that neither eye socket, nose, mouth or other salient points of the formation of a random light and shadow play was due. to convince
To the critics of the accuracy of their assumption that it is not surprising as the formation of an artificial construct, the two researchers looked for other pictures. They were quickly found and discovered the recording 70A13, which was taken 35 days after the first frame. However, the conditions were quite different. The orbit of the probe was lower the camera angle and the sun was compared to the first recording another. Those who believed the Mars face had now finally turned into a natural rock formation, looked disappointed. The recording was in resolution and quality still significantly better and shows more details of the face. Thus, a second eye socket was visible, the hairline "Page hairstyle called" framed the second half of the face and a jawline became apparent. The greatest discovery, however, were pyramids about 15 km away from the face. The outer edges and corners were perfectly symmetrical and a side line would be extended to run parallel to the axis of Mars .. Pure chance or a freak of nature?
order to have final certainty was analyzed both recordings by false color coding. The result was a sensation. The face was absolutely identical in both images. The orbits also hid eyeballs including pupils, the hairline and the mouth was much better advantage. The scientists discovered a stone tear on the cheek illuminated by sunlight. Their discovery commented DiPietro and Molenaar then again:
"When have many striking details of the stone head, of course, has formed, the nature itself be a highly intelligent being."
goods now silenced the critics. Not at all. They remained in their opinion that it is only an artificial rock formation. What can not be allowed to not be! This one does not need to travel into space to a similar formation including pyramids to look at. Even a flight over the Pyramids of Giza revealed surprising.
Mars Global Surveyor in 1998
Although, as the attentive observer can have that supposedly new images with those of the Viking spacecraft in fact nothing in common. On the "new" pictures to the face are merely a rock that has generated randomly by shadow this facial shape, we already know that this is not the case, as there are shots from different angles with different position of the sun and different altitude of the probe. Here are the graphics experts have even committed a crucial error to which I have come to speak. on the new images, which differ in the other extreme from each other (maybe it was an internal competition to see who was capable of the best fake be made by the Mars face), it looks like the face is actually just a rock of since the recordings inundated in 1976, now by huge amounts of dust and / or sand. Then I ask myself the question:
If the "new" pictures really really are, how can it be possible that the face or the alleged rock thousands of years on Mars was clearly recognizable as a human face, then suddenly, within a few years (Viking 1976 - MGS 1998) almost entirely from dust and to disappear or sand? Here again a direct comparison
When the face now has an incredible length of 1.5 kilometers, then the height should be about 200 to 300 meters. I have illustrated this graphically with a Viking image in as:
A Explanation of the circumstances that would cause such an extreme change in the surface of Mars in the period between the Viking and MGS images-images, we will probably never received by NASA. This is also not necessary because the "new" pictures to prove in themselves that they can not be real.
Suppose the face, according to NASA and the mountain, disappears almost completely under dust or does not exist as you would on the old images but can be clearly seen. is generated on the Viking image (left) we see clearly a shadow of at least 200 meters high from the face (or mountain) (orange): How can you then explain the following. On the new image is the Face and the total actual mountain on the left (yellow) completely disappeared in the pictures at the bottom. One can clearly see the image at right no shadow is seen, there is no body that is supposedly more. If that's the case, and the mountain face and now almost completely covered was, then why are the new pictures still small and far shallower crater (red) visible? This would be totally disappeared when the face is over 200 meters high, the crater only a few meters. These are not fakes - they are not to bad! Apparently, it is sufficient to provide the people some images from the NASA-tale book, to make it in the belief that the earth is the center of the universe and man, the crown of creation. NASA has to explore in any case all the time, the artifacts, all under the camera. The Mars anomalies
2004 in the book "The Hidden Records by Wayne Herschel, the clearest images of the published controversial face on Mars and the five-sided pyramids, which has not been seen before. (Click on the pictures to enlarge them)
The book presents an archaeological comparative study between some of the found pattern debris of destroyed pyramids in Egypt and similar patterns found on Mars. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment